MiniMax MiniMax M2 vs Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, MiniMax MiniMax M2 is the more secure of the two: MiniMax M2 scores 40.0% and Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
MiniMax M2 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for MiniMax MiniMax M2 vs Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- MiniMax MiniMax M2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax MiniMax M2 or Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, MiniMax MiniMax M2 is the more secure of the two: MiniMax M2 scores 40.0% and Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of MiniMax M2 vs Qwen QwQ 32B?
MiniMax M2 has a 40.0% ASR and Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were MiniMax M2 and Qwen QwQ 32B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.