MiniMax MiniMax M2: LLM Security & Jailbreak Resistance
As of 2026-07-04, MiniMax MiniMax M2 has an attack success rate (ASR) of 40.0% on Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark — ranking #56 of 93 models. It is weakly resistant — adversarial prompts succeed often without added guardrails.
Attack Success Rate (ASR) is the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks (HarmBench framework). Lower is safer. "Est." models are calibrated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
How MiniMax M2 compares
Frequently asked questions
How secure is MiniMax MiniMax M2 against jailbreaks?
MiniMax MiniMax M2 is weakly resistant — adversarial prompts succeed often without added guardrails. On Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark it records a 40.0% attack success rate (60% robustness), ranking #56 of 93 models (estimated from public safety evaluations).
What is MiniMax M2's attack success rate (ASR)?
MiniMax M2's overall ASR is 40.0% — the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Is MiniMax M2 more secure than MiniMax M1 80K?
MiniMax M2 is more robust: 40.0% ASR vs MiniMax M1 80K's 43.0%. See the full head-to-head comparison for the per-attack breakdown.
How can I make MiniMax M2 safer to deploy?
Even robust models are bypassed under sustained attack. An inline runtime guardrail that classifies prompts and responses — like Guardion's prompt-defense models — blocks jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach MiniMax M2.
Harden MiniMax M2 in production
Guardion's runtime guardrails block jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach any model — with sub-130ms policy decisions.
Request a demo