Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: LLM Security & Jailbreak Resistance
As of 2026-07-04, Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has an attack success rate (ASR) of 34.0% on Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark — ranking #44 of 93 models. It is moderately resistant — a meaningful share of adversarial prompts succeed.
Attack Success Rate (ASR) is the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks (HarmBench framework). Lower is safer. "Est." models are calibrated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
How Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking compares
Frequently asked questions
How secure is Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking against jailbreaks?
Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is moderately resistant — a meaningful share of adversarial prompts succeed. On Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark it records a 34.0% attack success rate (66% robustness), ranking #44 of 93 models (estimated from public safety evaluations).
What is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's attack success rate (ASR)?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's overall ASR is 34.0% — the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking more secure than Qwen 2.5 72B?
Qwen 2.5 72B is more robust: 26.3% ASR vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's 34.0%. See the full head-to-head comparison for the per-attack breakdown.
How can I make Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking safer to deploy?
Even robust models are bypassed under sustained attack. An inline runtime guardrail that classifies prompts and responses — like Guardion's prompt-defense models — blocks jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
Harden Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in production
Guardion's runtime guardrails block jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach any model — with sub-130ms policy decisions.
Request a demo