Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle is the more secure of the two: Mistral NeMo Instruct scores 50.0% and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle scores 33.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle is the overall winner in this comparison!
ASR for Mistral Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Outward is better on every axis.
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle is the more secure of the two: Mistral NeMo Instruct scores 50.0% and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle scores 33.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Mistral NeMo Instruct has a 50.0% ASR and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 Eagle has a 33.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.