Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M vs Lakera Guard

Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails

MetaLakera

On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Lakera Guard is the more secure of the two: Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% and Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).

Head-to-Head Overview

Guard is the overall winner in this comparison!

Guardrail Metrics

F1 Score

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

Accuracy

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

Precision

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

Recall

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

False Positive Rate

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

False Negative Rate

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

Average Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

p50 Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

p90 Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
Guard
0.000

Key Highlights

No specific highlights generated for this comparison.

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

F1 ScoreAccuracyPrecisionRecallFPRFNRAverage Latency (ms)p50 Latency (ms)p90 Latency (ms)
Prompt Guard 2 86M
Guard
Full security profile
Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M
Full security profile
Lakera Guard

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M or Lakera Guard more secure?

On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Lakera Guard is the more secure of the two: Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% and Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).

What is the F1 score of Prompt Guard 2 86M vs Guard?

Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% F1 and Guard scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.

How were Prompt Guard 2 86M and Guard tested?

Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.

Related Comparisons