Meta Llama Guard vs Alibaba QwenGuard4B
Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Alibaba QwenGuard4B is the more secure of the two: Llama Guard scores NaN% and QwenGuard4B scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
QwenGuard4B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Guardrail Metrics
F1 Score
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
False Positive Rate
False Negative Rate
Average Latency (ms)
p50 Latency (ms)
p90 Latency (ms)
Key Highlights
No specific highlights generated for this comparison.
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Meta Llama Guard or Alibaba QwenGuard4B more secure?
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Alibaba QwenGuard4B is the more secure of the two: Llama Guard scores NaN% and QwenGuard4B scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
What is the F1 score of Llama Guard vs QwenGuard4B?
Llama Guard scores NaN% F1 and QwenGuard4B scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.
How were Llama Guard and QwenGuard4B tested?
Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.