Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT vs Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct is the more secure of the two: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT scores 55.0% and Qwen2 7B Instruct scores 52.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen2 7B Instruct is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT vs Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct has a lower Overall (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT or Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct is the more secure of the two: Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT scores 55.0% and Qwen2 7B Instruct scores 52.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT vs Qwen2 7B Instruct?
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a 55.0% ASR and Qwen2 7B Instruct has a 52.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT and Qwen2 7B Instruct tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.