Amazon Nova Pro vs Cohere Command A

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonCohere

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and Command A scores 26.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Pro is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Pro vs Cohere Command A. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Pro
24.0%
Command A
26.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Command A
61.2%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Command A
50.5%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Command A

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Pro has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Cohere Command A has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
  • Cohere Command A has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Pro
Command A
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Pro
Full security profile
Cohere Command A

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Cohere Command A more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and Command A scores 26.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Pro vs Command A?

Nova Pro has a 24.0% ASR and Command A has a 26.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Pro and Command A tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons