Amazon Nova Premier vs Deepseek Deepseek V3

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonDeepseek

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Premier is the more secure of the two: Nova Premier scores 20.0% and Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Premier is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Premier vs Deepseek Deepseek V3. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Premier
20.0%
Deepseek V3
47.2%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek V3
79.5%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek V3
49.3%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek V3
12.8%

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Premier has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Premier
Deepseek V3
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Premier
Full security profile
Deepseek Deepseek V3

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Premier or Deepseek Deepseek V3 more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Premier is the more secure of the two: Nova Premier scores 20.0% and Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Premier vs Deepseek V3?

Nova Premier has a 20.0% ASR and Deepseek V3 has a 47.2% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Premier and Deepseek V3 tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons