Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Qwen 7-72BB is the overall winner in this comparison!
ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Outward is better on every axis.
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Qwen 7-72BB has a 36.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.